We
Work With Teams!
We recognize that there are multiple forms of teams and that
contextual issues impact every team in a unique manner. Common
forms of teams include project
teams, operational
teams, integrated teams, and executive
management teams. DW & A consultants tailor
their approach to the type of team and to the context within
which the team is operating. This customized, client-centered
methodology ensures that meaningful results are achieved.
We guarantee it!
Project Teams
When a team is assembled for a specific purpose
with a pre-defined end-point it faces a number of extraordinary
challenges. Project teams are generally comprised of an assortment
of technical experts that likely have not worked together
before. This, combined with the fact that the outcome is often
only defined conceptually and the means to achieve the outcome
are only vaguely understood, project teams are notorious for
getting mired in ambiguity. A deliberate, focused effort to
‘fast-track’ team development, and then keep it
on track can be the difference between a successful project
and one that is overdue and over budget.
Operational
Teams
People who work closely together over an undefined
period of time generating repetitive and/or replicable outcomes
are the most common form of team in the workplace. These are
teams that, because they exist indefinitely, will experience
various transitions including growth or contraction, member
departures and replacements, changes in leadership, changes
in technology. These teams often struggle with a periodic
need to re-define themselves as a team in light of the changes.
Unfortunately, there is a tendency to view these teams as
fairly static because the actual work they do remains quite
constant. The reality is that the culture within these teams
can be impacted significantly by the changes. Proactively
supporting these teams as they deal with the changes pays
dividends in terms of performance and overall team stability.
Integrated Teams
Many industries commonly utilize teams comprised
of individuals representing a variety of professional disciplines.
Often, these ‘cross-functional’ teams (a.k.a.
business units, asset management teams, etc.) are established
in an effort to eliminate barriers created by the ‘silo’
effect of functionally based organizational structures. It
is often assumed that these groups will learn to function
effectively over time. Empirical evidence suggests otherwise.
Integrated teams are generally dealing with a complex array
of processes in dynamic environments. A clear path that will
ensure success is seldom obvious. These teams must develop
the means by which to deal with ongoing complications in a
manner that utilizes all the expertise on the team. However,
the ability to do so is generally compromised by the need
to keep up to an overwhelming amount of technical work. Engaging
in an ongoing exercise of "continuous improvment"
substantially increases the success of integrated teams.
Executive Management Teams
Executive management teams tend to be very
unique forms of teams, particularly in large organizations.
Thinking that they function like other types of teams often
creates inappropriate expectations within the organization.
Members of executive management teams generally ‘represent’
a functional unit and therefore feel an obligation to protect
their ‘constituents’. Moreover, they often have
limited, if any, interaction with their executive management
team members outside the prescribed meetings. Consequently,
they have little opportunity to build and/or maintain any
meaningful sense of team. This is precisely why many business
issues in organizations become 'politicized'. To be effective
as an executive management team, they need to make the most
of the limited time they spend together to ensure that they
are providing optimal value to the organization.
A Process for Team Development

|